<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSpec vs Test::Unit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teachmetocode.com/articles/rspec-vs-testunit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teachmetocode.com/articles/rspec-vs-testunit/</link>
	<description>Writing Code is the Easy Part</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor piousbox</title>
		<link>http://teachmetocode.com/articles/rspec-vs-testunit/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>victor piousbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesmaxwood.com/?p=304#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>&quot;the way in which you write the tests—the semantics—is the primary difference between the two.&quot;

Um, semantics is the meaning, not the way of expression. So they differ in style and equal in semantics. I think.

Good post ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the way in which you write the tests—the semantics—is the primary difference between the two.&#8221;</p>
<p>Um, semantics is the meaning, not the way of expression. So they differ in style and equal in semantics. I think.</p>
<p>Good post <img src='http://teachmetocode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Chelimsky</title>
		<link>http://teachmetocode.com/articles/rspec-vs-testunit/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>David Chelimsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesmaxwood.com/?p=304#comment-526</guid>
		<description>Here are some links:

http://pragprog.com/titles/achbd/the-rspec-book
http://rspec.info/
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec/1.2.7
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec (for other versions)
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec-rails/1.2.7
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec-rails (for other versions)
http://blog.davidchelimsky.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some links:</p>
<p><a href="http://pragprog.com/titles/achbd/the-rspec-book" rel="nofollow">http://pragprog.com/titles/achbd/the-rspec-book</a><br />
<a href="http://rspec.info/" rel="nofollow">http://rspec.info/</a><br />
<a href="http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec/1.2.7" rel="nofollow">http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec/1.2.7</a><br />
<a href="http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec" rel="nofollow">http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec</a> (for other versions)<br />
<a href="http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec-rails/1.2.7" rel="nofollow">http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec-rails/1.2.7</a><br />
<a href="http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec-rails" rel="nofollow">http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec-rails</a> (for other versions)<br />
<a href="http://blog.davidchelimsky.net" rel="nofollow">http://blog.davidchelimsky.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://teachmetocode.com/articles/rspec-vs-testunit/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesmaxwood.com/?p=304#comment-525</guid>
		<description>David,

Thanks for the feedback. Is there a good source for picking up on some of those things? Feel free to post some links or email me so that I can do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. Is there a good source for picking up on some of those things? Feel free to post some links or email me so that I can do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Chelimsky</title>
		<link>http://teachmetocode.com/articles/rspec-vs-testunit/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>David Chelimsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesmaxwood.com/?p=304#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Hey Charles,

Thanks for posting this. I&#039;m glad you like and use RSpec. But Jim&#039;s article, and a lot has changed since then. It&#039;s not just semantics anymore.

Consider pending examples, easily customizable output formatters, nested example groups for improved structure, and component isolation in rspec-rails, etc, etc. These are all things that impact the process of doing TDD much more than the satisfying feeling one gets writing prettier tests. I like that satisfying feeling too, but that&#039;s really only scratching the surface of what RSpec has to offer.

Also - small typo: replace define with describe.

Cheers,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Charles,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this. I&#8217;m glad you like and use RSpec. But Jim&#8217;s article, and a lot has changed since then. It&#8217;s not just semantics anymore.</p>
<p>Consider pending examples, easily customizable output formatters, nested example groups for improved structure, and component isolation in rspec-rails, etc, etc. These are all things that impact the process of doing TDD much more than the satisfying feeling one gets writing prettier tests. I like that satisfying feeling too, but that&#8217;s really only scratching the surface of what RSpec has to offer.</p>
<p>Also &#8211; small typo: replace define with describe.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

